Thursday, 15 October 2009

The Irony of Anti-Masonry

It was only a matter of time before someone doing a newspaper story on “the Masons’” reaction to the Brown novel would get some reaction from the other side. It seems only fair. And it gives you an idea of how weak the antis’ arguement against Freemasonry really is.

You can read the newspaper story here.

Let me say that if someone feels their religious beliefs are incompatible with Freemasonry, they shouldn’t become members. No one is forcing anyone to join. Such a thing would be silly; you can’t coerce someone into being a good member of a volunteer organisation. But one would hope that someone would be honest enough with themselves that their opposition to Masonic membership is legitimate.

The reporter, in my estimation, puts his finger on the situation in a few short words:
So why would anyone label the Freemasons a cult? Maybe it has to do with members’ mystery-shrouded rituals
If someone strips away the mystery and uses equivalents from normal, every-day life that people are acquainted with, they can see how off-centre some of the arguements against Masonic membership are.

One of the points made by the anti-Mason in the story was:
he also says it’s [Freemasonry is] anti-Christian because it doesn’t require belief in the God of the Bible
That’s quite true. Neither does the 4-H Club, the Book of the Month club, a membership at a gym or the Boy Scouts. Substitute any of these groups for “Freemasonry” and you can see how ridiculous the claim is.

Later, we read:
[Freemasonry] demands that members swear oaths despite the Bible’s proscription against such practices.
Of course, the President of the United States takes an oath of office. Oaths are still common in a court of law. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath. If an anti went around bleating that the U.S. government, the justice system or being treated by a doctor was anti-Christian, he’d be laughed at as a nut-job.

Ah, but Freemasonry has those “mystery-shrouded rituals.” Most people aren’t Freemasons and don’t know about Freemasonry. Being unfamiliar with it, they’re more willing to buy into false claims of “anti-Christian.” How are they to know otherwise? Make the same claim about the Boy Scouts, and they’ll call BS on it.

A more interesting claim is:
The organization is based on ancient fertility cults, not stoneworkers’ groups and spiritual knowledge
Anti-Masons should realise that just as anyone can connect-the-dots to “prove” untrue things about Freemasonry, anyone can do the same about anything else. It doesn’t take a lot of effort to point out things like Easter eggs and Christmas trees, and connect the next dot to make the claim that Christianity “is based on ancient fertility cults.” The line of reasoning is no different. Such a claim would be laughable, of course. As laughable as the claim about Freemasonry and “ancient fertility rites.”

I don’t know of any fertility rites that show off stonemasons’ tools, have a discourse on the building of a temple from the Old Testament, or give admonitions to be good citizens and help others in need if possible.

Antis seem quite willing to ignore the fact that symbols can be, have been, and are, used in different ways in different eras and places. What someone else did with them is meaningless, as meaningless as what so-called pagans did with trees that today are lovingly decorated by Christian families during the season to honour Christ’s birth (trees topped with a star that antis have linked to Satan, no less).

It’s how Freemasonry uses those symbols that is relevant to its members, not anyone else.

I’m sure many Masons could echo the thoughts of one of the Masons interviewed:
“It [Freemasonry] has helped me solidify my (Christian) faith.”
I would hope so. There’s no reason it should not. Faith is one of the principle virtues outlined in the First Degree. Masons are reminded throughout the ceremonies to follow the tenets of their faith, not to ignore them or toss them away. In fact, that is one of their duties.

Granted, Masons are free to decide their religious beliefs for themselves. In democratic nations, such things are even protected by law. In the United States freedom of religion is guaranteed under the Constitution. Anti-Masons seem to have a problem with that. Yet, were they to screech and parrot each other on web sites that the U.S. Constitution is “anti-Christian,” their beliefs would be readily seen for the foolishness they are.

When it comes to Freemasonry, the ones who cry “cult” are generally the ones who want to dictate what religious beliefs others should follow.

The irony seems to escape them.

7 comments:

lightseeker said...

You forgot to mention the rediculous quotes from Bill Schnoebelen. The man who has been everything, all at the same time. Including a vampire and a satanist, so he says! Irony indeed!

MP said...

A former Mason, William Schnoebelen

Who is now, and always has been, an oathbreaker and a liar.

He has jumped from one esoteric or occult group to another.

My only guess is that he joined all these groups just so he could write badly about them.

Unfortunately, he was legitimately initiated into Wicca, from what I have read, but this was prior to him deciding he was against everything he joined.

Jim said...

I've participated in several online debates about just this topic, and it always ends up being one-sided against the Freemason, ultimately, because of the anti's unwillingness to even trust the word of a Freemason. I've shown openness, honesty, transparency, and in all cases, am shot down for my unwillingness to "see the error of my ways." Bah!

And I also agree with the response about solidifying one's Christian faith. I concur 100%. Freemasonry has neither done or taught ANYTHING to cause me to question my Christian faith or to cause me to cause others to question their faith. Quite the opposite. Having gone through the York Rite all the way through the Order of the Temple (Knight Templar) I can only say with 100% honesty that my faith as a Christian has deepened as a result.

Justa Mason said...

LS, I didn't "forget" to mention it. I deliberately did not mention any names. I am addressing the claim, not the individual. The false statements being made are false no matter who is saying them.

Jim, you'll see some antis going on and on about how Masons are "liars" but then they (supposedly) quote Albert Pike or bleat about "Masons in their own words." But.. but.. wasn't Pike a Mason? Why don't they say he is lying? (the question is rhetorical).

Their arguements are wildly inconsistent at best.

By the way, in England and other parts of the British Commonwealth, a petitioner for the KT must declare he accepts Jesus Christ as the Saviour. In fact, the declaration is repeated at the beginning of one of the Templar Orders here. But the antis kinda ignore that.

Justa

freddo said...

I've gone through all three of the Blue Lodge Degrees (My EA in August, my FC in September, and was just raised as an MM this past Thursday) and the degrees and lessons of the Lodge have also served to deepen my own Christian Faith and commitment. I've actually been more active in my church since being initiated rather than the other way around.

I've also noticed how many of the so-called "ultra-Christian" Anti-Masons like Bill Schnoebelen and Jim Shaw and others tend to bend the truth quite a bit. Not something a Christian should do.

Also, on the subject of oaths, I had to take oaths to join the Boy Scouts many years back, also to enlist in the Army Reserve back in the 1980's, and I had to take an oath to become a Federal Civil Service employee (US Dept of Veterans' Affairs, my current employer) about 4 years ago. I didn't think any of my Masonic Oaths and Obligations to take my degrees were that horrible; instead, I think of them as serious and binding.

Last of all, in my jurisdiction (Pennsylvania) the York Rite Petition has a statement on it in which the petitioner states that he "...subscribes to the Christian religion". I wish the Anti-Masons would do better research and take all of these things into evidence. But, apparently, it's not something that helps their case. Don't they have to sell books and tapes?

freddo said...

Actually, a small emendation to my last statement...the statement on the York Rite petition in our state pertians only to the Knights Templar. My mistake. (It has been a little while since I've last last looked at it...it can be seen online at: http://www.knightstemplar.org/newsrelease/Back.pdf)

-FRED

Justa Mason said...

Fred, as you know, the ceremonies are pretty clear. An Entered Apprentice is told to follow his faith. But some antis have bent logic to reach a goofy conclusion that somewhere in some nebulous higher degrees no one knows about (except them) it's all a fraud.

Of course, if one isn't a member of their imaginary higher degree, it's unclear how one is bound by anything in it, just as a Jewish Mason isn't bound by a Knights Templar obligation he hasn't taken.

To be honest, I don't know how many books and tapes these people sell any more. In fact, they may be drowned out themselves by the rant-astic ravings of extreme kooks that populate the internet.

Justa